Sunday, February 19, 2017

Crain's: BAM-area retail is hottest corridor (so what about Site 5?)


Crain's New York Business reported 2/16/17 Brooklyn's hottest intersection for retail:
Commercial brokerage firm CPEX Real Estate last month designated six Brooklyn corridors as the borough’s next retail hot spots. No. 1 on the list? The intersection of Lafayette Avenue and Fulton Street, which sits at the crossroads of the growing Brooklyn Cultural District and Fort Greene.
CPEX’s reasoning was simple: The nearby blocks are teeming with new development, including 3,800 residential units, 900 hotel rooms and highly anticipated retail locations such as Apple’s second Brooklyn store and the first city outpost of Whole Foods’ 365, a new chain of lower-priced stores. 
All are interwoven into the booming cultural district, anchored by the Brooklyn Academy of Music, that includes new public plazas and parks.
The interior retail space at One Hanson, the former Williamsburgh Savings Bank building, is facing alteration.

So, the question for the developers of Atlantic Yards/Pacific Park is whether that's going to help/boost or detract from the planned luxury retail at the not-yet-approved Site 5 project.

Saturday, February 18, 2017

The scalping scene outside the Barclays Center seems unmolested (at least for the Nets)

Gothamist had a very intriguing article 2/10/17, The Hard Life Of An Old School Scalper In The Age Of StubHub, with a cameo played by "Michael," a scalper at Nets home games.

He gets his inventory from brokers or fans with extra tickets. One example: he bought a ticket for five dollars, and sold it for ten. From Carter Maness's article:
Michael periodically huddled up with other scalpers to compare inventory, but mostly worked his turf alone. There were approximately 15 others posted near the arena's entrances, and they were careful not to step on each other's toes. NYPD vans lined the perimeter. Security guards were fanned out among the crowd, but they studiously looked away from any transactions.
"It's a violation, not a crime, most of the time," Michael said. "As long as you're not directly in front of the venue, it's usually not a problem. But you can get a summons. Sometimes, if they have warrants, people go to jail."
Anyone who's walked through the arena plaza, or hung out there, has seen the scalpers and/or been approached.

If arena security officers don't care, it's because they want people in the building and/or have better things to do. (The more counterfeit tickets, though, the more the brand suffers.)

As for the cops, collaring scalpers could be low-hanging fruit, as it could be for finding parking violations on nearby streets. But I suspect it's not a priority, either, unless it affects public safety.

Previous coverage of scalping, and comments

In December 2012, I cited a first look at scalping, and a report from a reader who bought a counterfeit Nets ticket. In October 2013, the New York Police Department reported that, in the first nine months of the year, there had been 45 arrests outside or inside the arena, such as for illegal scalping, unlicensed vendors, and trespassing

A report from a wrestling event

On Reddit, the professional wrestling community Squared Circle, one poster a year ago wrote that "the level of people who got scammed [at a Barclays wrestling event] was unprecedented": 
1) Someone set up a printer and let people print off their digital tickets for $5. This was legit, but actually forced the ticket prices UP instead of down at showtime.
2) People sold fake/doubles of digital tickets over and over again. (Including a group of teenagers that were warned by a crowd that it would be bad, but didn't listen!)
3) BS secondary market sites. This was apparently a big one.
4) Fake HARD COPY tickets. This surprised even the cops, as one told me that the precinct was lined with people who got ripped for $400-$1300 and even more.
Some were straight up pros that were known to security and have been playing people for years.
Events like this is a breeding ground for these scam artists looking at banking off good people looking for an enjoyable experience. They are BLATANT. Especially when people are just trying to take their kids to see their heroes, people are willing to put logic aside to get their kids what they want.
Another poster wrote that he "once got scammed outside Barclays for $15 for a Nets ticket."

Friday, February 17, 2017

Gilmartin: number of affordable applications "reaffirmed urgency" of building 2,250 units (so where are they?)

I missed this 12/28/16 end-of-year wrap-up by Curbed, which had a quote from Forest City Ratner CEO MaryAnne Gilmartin, "[o]n realizing a Brooklyn megaproject in 2016."

Her statement:
“Pacific Park may have had the longest beginning of any project in city history, and no one, including us, could have anticipated how this project would fundamentally transform Brooklyn. 2016 was certainly a banner year for the project. Six Pacific Park properties are now under construction, and our affordable housing lotteries attracted tens of thousands of applicants. Last month, 461 Dean became Pacific Park’s first residential property to open. After a decade of planning and building, it would be hard to overstate the emotions we feel that families now call Pacific Park home.”
“We knew there was an affordable housing crisis in Brooklyn, but we were floored by the number of applicants we received for below market-rate units at Pacific Park. Over 84,000 applicants applied for 181 units at 461 Dean. We knew it was important for us to bring 2,250 affordable units to the borough, but this reaffirmed the urgency of the situation.”
(Emphases added)

First, for two of those six properties there's been exactly zero progress in months--the 615 Dean site (B12)  is looking for a new investor, and the 664 Pacific site (B15) is stalled by litigation involving a neighboring property.

Second, the residential project has not fundamentally transformed Brooklyn, since it's taken so long. It will be interesting to see how Prospect Heights and points north may/will be knit together if/when the railyard is platformed and built on.

The march of towers down Flatbush Avenue, all the way to the Brooklyn Academy of Music, has already gone part of the way to redefining the skyline around Downtown Brooklyn, while Atlantic Yards/Pacific Park will transform part of Brooklyn, transposing downtown scale and extreme density into neighborhood Brooklyn.

If/when a giant project at Site 5 is built, depending on the bulk, that could be more broadly transformational, and likely in a very mixed way.

Has the arena transformed Brooklyn? Well, it's certainly brought a higher profile and catalyzed new retail investment. But until/unless it removes the "blight" of the below-grade railyard, we should be cautious. After all, changes in/around the Brooklyn Academy of Music nearby are also transformational, in terms of retail, according to Crain's.

Affordable housing: demand for lower-income units

So, because there were 84,000 applicants for below-market units--half the units at 461 Dean--this reaffirmed the urgency of the need to build all 2,250 units? If so, then why are so many of the apartments in the next two buildings aimed at households earning six figures, not the people who need it most? 

If so, why aren't they building more affordable units next? The next two projects, currently stalled or delayed, are B12, a condo tower, and B15, an all-market rental tower, with a school at its based.

And how much of a dent can the project make by the 2025 deadline for the affordable units?

Note that Curbed 2/15/17 reported that 87,000 people applied for the affordable units at 325 Kent Avenue, the first rental building in the New Domino project. That's an 80/20 building, so there are fewer units, but all for low-income households:
The question of what’s deemed “affordable” can hang over the apartments that come to market as part of these lotteries. But in the case of 325 Kent, the units were aimed at lower-income New Yorkers making up to 50 percent of the area median income (so, at the high end, about $45,000 for a family of four). None of the affordable units themselves (a mix of studios, and one- and two-bedrooms) will rent for more than about $1,000.
That reflects the fact that the need--and thus demand--is highest for lower-income units. Supplying middle-income affordable units helps get the numbers up, and certainly represents good fortune for those winning the lottery, but is hardly addressing the "urgency of the situation"

City Council Watch: Cumbo had (former/potential) rival Fox fired

Seth Barron of City Council Watch has good sources, but this also doesn't have comment from the principals, so it's not ironclad, but he reports that 35th District Council Member Laurie Cumbo had former rival Ede Fox fired from her Council job, claiming that Fox was doing opposition research.

Fox, according to Kings County Politics, has formed a campaign committee (though her name doesn't yet appear on the city's Campaign Finance Database).

Thursday, February 16, 2017

Gilmartin's goal: "deliver to Brooklyn" (er, investors) an iconic office tower

From GFCP presentation; note that
Site 5 tower would be far taller and
bulkier than Williamsburgh Bank
Yesterday, the Commercial Observer posted a video interview (also below) with Forest City Ratner CEO MaryAnne Gilmartin. And while Max Gross's questions were softball, some news emerged.

Notably, Gilmartin has a clear focus on "an iconic office building" at Site 5 that's an analogue to the Time Warner Center, which will require state approval, after a public process not yet initiated, to move approved bulk from the arena plaza across the street to the site currently occupied by Modell's and P.C. Richard.

That would create a building more than twice the bulk, at some 1 million square feet--and perhaps triple the height, nearing 800 feet--previously permitted, across the street from row houses. (My coverage.)

So stay tuned for arguments about jobs, architecture, and the need to preserve that "public plaza" at the entrance to the Barclays Center, which just happens to be branded by a casino.

Given the history of the project, the gubernatorially-controlled Empire State Development will approve whatever the developer--now Greenland Forest City Partners--wants. But in this case it will have to confront not only questions of why the City Planning Commission in 2006 recommended that the Site 5 tower be reduced (to 250 feet), but also whether an "office tower" with "jobs" is also a condo tower with 188,000 square feet of high-end retail.

The Pacific Park partnership

Earlier in the interview, Gross asks Gilmartin about Pacific Park Brooklyn.

"It's a great question," Gilmartin replies amiable, "because if the project is anything at all, it's a series of partnerships. We have partnerships with the city, we have partnerships with the state. I would say every agency in New York City government has touched this project. We have since sold the team and the arena to the company Onexim, which is run by Mikhail Prokhorov."



"And, as we looked at the timeline for building all the residential, we realized, with all the equity we put into the project, and the need for speed and the desire to build, we would be wise to bring a partner in," she says, not quite pointing out that they needed to reduce risk and were willing to take a loss. "And we set out to find a partner, a well-capitalized partner."

"We're talking about an equity investment that could approach $800 million by the time the project is brought into fruition," she says. "That's not an easy check to write, and to explain the project to an investor is another really complicated matter."

"So we knew we needed to deal with a very sophisticated outfit that really understood our business. And in Greenland, we found that," she continues. "This is a $50 billion Chinese developer... they do it at a scale that could be viewed as small, compared to the things that they undertake. And I have to say that we have had enormous success with Greenland. We have a cultural experiment folding on the 18th floor here. We have over 25 Chinese nationals working side by side."

Success, and delays

For now it's a partnership with "enormous success," but that partnership itself has decided to try to sell stakes in three building sites, B12, B13, and B3, which suggests Greenland doesn't want to write the check any more.

And Forest City does have a track record of conflict with some partners, notably Skanska on the modular building and Blumenfeld Development Group on the Nassau Coliseum.

Shortly after I annotated the map below last October, Forest City's parent company announced unspecified delays in the project.


The arena and the Nets

When asked about the Barclays Center and the Nets, Gilmartin talked about having to sell the team and arena (operating company), acknowledging, "It's a perfect example of how you can't get too emotional about real estate. Because selling the arena was the right thing to do."

The Site 5 tower

"Tell us a little about what you'd like to see change in the borough," Gross asks.

"Brooklyn's arrived in so many ways, residentially speaking. We have a sports arena," Gilmartin replies. "The notion of Brooklyn having a Class A, 21st-century iconic office building--that hasn't quite happened yet. And so you have buildings like Watchtower, you have converted warehouses down in DUMBO,  but you do not have a building that would be Brooklyn's own version of  Time Warner Center."

[Update: as the commenter points out, the 2.8 million square foot Time Warner Center in Manhattan is not purely an office tower. It actually has 1.1 million square feet of office space, as well as residential, hotel, and retail space. Another Forest City executive likened the Site 5 project to the Time Warner Center in terms of retail.]

"And I would say that, on my watch, if you said to me what would make you most proud if you think about life after New York Times Building, New York by Gehry, Barclays Center," she says, "I would say that being able to build an iconic office building, at Site 5, which is where Modell's and P.C. Richard's sit today, it's an unbelievable site, it has view corridors all the way to the Manhattan Bridge, up Flatbush Avenue."

"It has the gravitas to hold a million-square foot building, and the sister building would be the Barclays Center. So my dream for that corner of Brooklyn would be to deliver to Brooklyn a Class A icon in the commercial space."

Deliver to Brooklyn? Gilmartin is conflating location and benefit. Yes, the building would be placed in Brooklyn.

But Greenland Forest City Partners, which does not want the logistical and financial headaches of building the tower as approved at the prow of the arena--and likely agreed with new arena operating company owner Mikhail Prokhorov that no such tower would be built--is not building for Brooklyn. It's building for its investors.

Wednesday, February 15, 2017

So, the Vanderbilt Yard was platformed? Not quite.

Is Sunnyside Yards a Beacon of Affordable Housing and New Development? Perhaps, the Commercial Observer reported today. However, the original version had a pretty glaring error, as I pointed out on Twitter.



It's Atlantic Yards down the memory hole.

The railyard most assuredly has not been platformed, though preliminary work is ongoing. It's the Vanderbilt Yard, not Atlantic Yards, since that was a brand name for a development, no Pacific Park.

And it's not really Forest City's Pacific Park development, but Greenland Forest City Partners' project.

Note the updated article, which does not acknowledge a correction.


I get that there was an agreement to build a platform, yet unfulfilled. But inanimate objects like rail yards can't enter into agreements.



City officials hope to reduce uncertainty for those in affordable housing lotteries, predict only partial solutions

As I recently reported, applicants for affordable housing face anxiety and uncertainty as they go through the lottery process, unsure how long it will take, even putting job or relocation decisions on hold as they await word.

And there's no solution just yet. City officials have produced a report, Improving Access to Affordable Housing Opportunities, which focuses on issues like financial preparedness and education about the lottery process, not the uncertainty faced by applicants.

The report does note, as I pointed out, that applicants expressed confusion regarding the wait:
The overall leasing process can be lengthy, in some instances taking more than a year. Updates about the status of one’s application are not always available, and applicants expressed worry that they were somehow forgotten or were missing emails, voicemails, and/or letters.
A separate document, After You Apply for Affordable Housing, focuses on ensuring that applicants prepare the proper information for their files to be evaluated, but leaves a general explanation about timing: "Interviews are usually scheduled from two to ten months after the application deadline."

So people wonder. As one 535 Carlton lottery applicant recently wrote on a forum for applicants, "I'm thinking about writing to our Mayor, about creating a portal with time frames, updates and status for applicants. This process is too nerve racking and should be a little more transparent once given an interview."

A 461 Dean applicant wrote, "The fact that they don't offer status updates is so lame. The should have a website that informs you of your status. Maybe do everything electronically.... I've been waiting for 5mths its been a nightmare. To be honest, I learned more from people on the forums than I did from Mhny [Mutual Housing Association of New York]."

NYC HDC "working to address" many concerns (but not all)

I queried the New York City Housing Development Corporation (NYC HDC) and got a response from Stephanie Mavronicolas, Director, External Affairs:
We are very sympathetic to the anxiety people feel, and are working to address many of the concerns that applicants have expressed in an upgrade of the Housing Connect system. While the changes will provide more information about where applicants are in the process, it is almost impossible to give an accurate status of where someone is in the process because there are so many factors that affect eligibility. We continue to work to standardize and make the process as transparent as possible, and coordinate closely with the marketing agencies to ensure that applicants are notified of their status in as timely a manner as possible.
(Emphasis added)

OK, it may be impossible to give individuals a specific update. But Mavronicolas's message suggests that it might be possible to explain the progress in filling available units in a building.

A complex process, and a developer's pushback

The challenge involves the interplay of city agencies--not just NYC HDC but in certain cases New York City Department of Housing Preservation and Development--with developers like Greenland Forest City Partners or nonprofit partners like Mutual Housing Association of New York (MHANY).

MHANY, formerly New York ACORN's housing arm, is processing the 84,000 applications for 461 Dean (181 units), the 95,000 applications for 535 Carlton (298 units), and the applications for 38 Sixth (303 units), for which the lottery is in process. (461 Dean is not being built/leased by the joint venture but by Forest City Ratner alone.)

I doubt nonprofits like MHANY have the funding/staff to adequately keep all informed; shouldn't that be the responsibility of the city?

At the recent bimonthly Atlantic Yards/Pacific Park Quality of Life meeting, I queried a representative for the developer. Noting that I'd read some forums in which lottery applicants for 461 Dean expressed significant anxiety and uncertainty, I asked, "Do you have a sense of how long that move-in--at least for the affordable units--is expected to take?"

"No. But if you do the math,... very single lease has to be approved by the government," responded Forest City Ratner executive Ashley Cotton, "and then it turns into a lease, and then it turns into a move-in. Move-ins are based on people's schedules... So, of course no, I can't tell you directly. I get that you read a chat room, where people are annoyed with the process, by the way, that's perfectly reasonable. Everyone loves housing, especially--there's a high demand for affordable housing. I feel impatient too. We are working as fast as possible. We currently have 800 units [actually, about 782] of affordable housing, they’re at different levels of move-in, completion, and construction. So, the team on this, I have full confidence in."

That answer might have been more satisfying had reps from MHANY or NYC HDC contributed.

I tried to follow up: "To clarify, what people have reported, and it's all second-hand, obviously, is some people say it's all going to be done in four months, and some people say they've been told eight to ten months. I'm trying to get a little clarity on that. What's the ballpark figure?"

"I don't know who's saying eight months, and who's saying four. I'm not going to guess at what they're hearing," Cotton responded. "But you could imagine, 800 units... we have a great team working on this. And a really great team on the government side, that has to approve every single applicant. So it's just a machine, where like, we put it in and it comes out... "

Comments from the applicants: timing

Keeping watch on the forums, I've noticed general frustration with the process, and both frustration and praise expressed toward representatives of MHANY and NYC HDC.

One wrote, "It took me 5 months to hear back from them to sign HDC paperwork so you guys shouldn't get discouraged yet."

One applicant reported being told "that its normal to be waiting this long because the process takes anywhere between 2-10 months. Its been 4 mths since I interviewed  Im so anxious."

Comments from the applicants: learning more

Another wrote that a phone call to HDC led to a phone call from MHANY saying the application was approved.

One reported that going "incessantly" to the [presumably MHANY] office was more effective than emails or phone calls, which prompted a response that such actions were both difficult for applicants and also insufferable for those working to process all the applications.

Comments from the applicants: what's the process

Another reported filing a complaint with HDC about "MHANY's inability to communicate effectively, calculate income correctly, etc etc."

Another wrote, "I mean I know people whom have moved into affordable housing apartments and their process was nothing like this.

Another described the process:
Your first "interview" is an intake interview. Someone sits with you and goes through a checklist to make sure you have brought all the necessary paperwork. They may inspect some of your paperwork in front of you but usually it's just a preliminary interview to collect your information.
Then, depending on your log #, the management company starts reviewing applicants and all of their paperwork and deems whether or not you qualify for the next step. This step is where many people get weeded out for various reasons, and also when rejection letters get sent out. HDC DOES NOT SEND OUT REJECTION LETTERS - only the management company does.
If you make it through the management company first round, you will then be contacted to come in and either clarify certain aspects of your paperwork and/or sign further paperwork which allows them to submit your paperwork to HDC. This is what happened with me last week.
Once your papers are sent to HDC, the average response time is 1-3 weeks, however that can take much longer. Once your paperwork is at HDC it is out of your hands and all you can do is wait. When HDC decides to review your paperwork they can ask for further clarifications or they can deny or approve you.
If approved from HDC you are basically good to go, as long as there is an apartment available for you. The management company will call or email you to let you know whether or not you've been approved and the next contact will be from the building management in order setup an appointment to come in and view an apartment and sign a lease.
The confusing part for me and which you might also be surprised by was being asked to view an apartment before my paperwork has been approved or denied by HDC. That part is unusual. My only guess is that the building is behind schedule and they are looking to fill the first six floors ASAP in order to start collecting some rent. But like I said previously, the building does not look close to being ready for occupancy and I'm sure the majority of move-ins wont take place until at least a few months from now.
At least, a community of sorts

Given the long odds applicants face, most won't win the lottery.

One summed up the frustration, at least for the large majority who didn't win: "The end of this Summer, we need to have a loser log party for all of us who went through this grueling crap and wound up with nothing."

Tuesday, February 14, 2017

From the latest Construction Alert: drilling at the railyard's eastern end

According to the latest Atlantic Yards/Pacific Park Construction Update (bottom), covering the two weeks beginning Feb. 13 and circulated yesterday at 1:24 pm (a bit late) by Empire State Development after preparation by Greenland Forest City Partners (GFCP), there's just one new piece of work indicated.

At the Vanderbilt Yard, "Drilling of 24” diameter load test piles for foundations in the B10 Building area will begin during this reporting period." The B10 site is at the eastern end of the railyard and the northeast corner of the project site, adjacent to Vanderbilt Avenue between Pacific Street and Atlantic Avenue.

Also, in comparison with the previous alert, there are some changes (plus a new staffer, Jeremy Cooney).

Regarding B3, 38 Sixth, "Site work along the front & rear of the building will continue." Previously the work was just in the rear.

At the Vanderbilt Yard, repairs to the approach slab at the southern end of the Sixth Avenue Bridge will begin--as stated in the previous alert, which means it didn't happen--pending receipt of permit. This work will occur at the intersection of 6th Avenue and Pacific Street. The work will require traffic lanes to be shifted, but traffic will remain two-way

Regarding B11, 550 Vanderbilt, open space work is ongoing, and includes pouring sidewalk and installing street poles. The Sidewalk Bridge is expected to be taken down--in the last Update, it "may" be taken down.

Weekend work

As in previous weeks, Saturday work could occur at B2 (461 Dean), B3, B12 (615 Dean Street), and B14 (535 Carlton). Then again, pretty much nothing has been happening at B12. No weekend work is predicted at B11.

Weekday foundation pile installation in the area the B5 site--east of Sixth Avenue, between Pacific Street and Atlantic Avenue--may extend work hours up to 5:30 pm and may occur on Saturdays.

The demolition that hasn't happened

As stated in the past 18 construction updates, demolition at Block 1120, the railyard block between Sixth and Carlton avenues, could commence upon receipt of Department of Buildings and Department of Transportation permits. A community notice will be distributed. Maybe it's not actually going to happen.

A transition at Empire State Development: Jordan out, Cooney in

A bit of personnel news snuck into the Atlantic Yards/Pacific Park Brooklyn Construction Alert distributed yesterday by Empire State Development.

A message from Jeremy Cooney, ESD Atlantic Yards team, said, "If you have any questions please don’t hesitate to contact me as Nicole Jordan has transitioned out of Empire State Development." The more turnover, the more institutional memory is lodged in... the developer (and the community).

Jordan was ESD’s Manager, Atlantic Yards/Pacific Park Brooklyn Project Community/Government Relations. Cooney's title is ESD’s Manager, Pacific Park Brooklyn Project Community/Government Relations. So much for hybrid names.

Cooney is the former Chief of Staff to the Mayor of Rochester. The Rochester Democrat and Chronicle reported 12/1/16 that Cooney was leaving to work for an unspecified branch of government. The article stated:
Cooney, a 35-year-old native of Rochester, has been Warren’s chief of staff since she took office as mayor in January 2014. A graduate of Hobart College and a lawyer by training, he came to the city after working as vice president of development for the YMCA of Greater Rochester.
After all, Cooney began tweeting enthusiastically about Pacific Park earlier this month:


Monday, February 13, 2017

Newsday says Coliseum uncertainties need clarity: despite promises, no minor-league hockey team, no islanders games, no related attractions

A Newsday editorial yesterday, Clear up unknowns around renovation of Nassau Coliseum
Nassau County Executive Edward Mangano is counting on a power-play goal. Big time.
He’s putting aside some terms of a lease that should provide significant revenue to the county in exchange for the unlikely possibility that the New York Islanders will return to Nassau Coliseum.
When Mangano and developer Bruce Ratner first announced their deal to redevelop the arena and the surrounding area in 2013, they highlighted promises of a minor-league hockey team, a few regular and preseason Islanders games, as well as retail shops and restaurants guaranteed to be finished just a few months after the arena was completed.
For now, although the arena is scheduled to reopen in April, none of the other promises will be a reality. The county is choosing not to enforce several clauses in its lease with Nassau Events Center, the group led by Ratner and Brooklyn Nets owner Mikhail Prokhorov that’s developing the Coliseum and the area around it. That’s a risky move.
Not only is there no anchor tenant, the attractions on the arena plaza, like a movie theater, aren't on their way.

So why does the lease mean so little. Newsday says Mangano--who's been indicted, I should add--doesn't need legislative approval. But, as Newsday observes, "it would have been appropriate for Mangano to discuss the changes he was considering far earlier."

So will the Islanders return and save the day? Stay tuned.

Skanska says it "expected to assemble a properly designed modular building, not engage in an iterative R&D experiment"


On 12/10/16, I noted that FastCo.Design's Prefab's Moment of Reckoning article dialed back the gush on the 461 Dean modular tower compared to the publication's previous coverage.

Still, I noted that the article relied on developer Forest City Ratner and architect SHoP to put the best possible spin on what was clearly a failure. From the article:
At the project's outset, it took the factory (managed by Skanska at the time) two to three weeks to build a module. By the end, under FCRC's management, the builders cut that down to six days. "The project took a little longer than expected and cost a little bit more than expected because we started the project with the wrong contractor," [Forest City's Adam] Greene says.
Skanska jabs back

Well, Forest City's estranged partner Skanska later weighed in--not sure whether they weren't asked or just missed a deadline--and their article was updated 12/13/16. Here's Skanska's statement, which shows the company jabbing back:
The challenge with a modular building is that all of the building’s major components, whether constructed in the field or the factory, must come together and be assembled at one location much like the frame and components of a car comes together for assembly on the factory floor. Workers on a factory floor should not be improvising or force fitting components. Accordingly, the designer of a modular building, like the designer of car, must not only consider how each component will be designed, but how all of the components will fit together and ultimately be assembled into one, integrated whole. As a result, the modular building designer has a much greater obligation than the designer of a conventional building that simply includes some prefabricated elements.
When Skanska made its agreement with Forest City, Forest City had claimed that it had "Cracked the Code" of modular design and construction. Skanska had no design responsibility for the B2 Project. In fact, Forest City agreed that Skanska was entitled to rely upon the information supplied to it by and on behalf of Forest City. Thus, Skanska expected to assemble a properly designed modular building, not engage in an iterative R&D experiment.
(Emphasis added)

Lawsuits pending

They're still suing each other, by the way. Two of the three legal cases in which Forest City and former partner Skanska are jousting about cost overruns have been adjourned until 6/28/17. The third case has not (yet) been rescheduled for that date.

The two cases are:
ATLANTIC YARDS B2 OWNER, LLC vs. SKANSKA USA BUILDING INC.
SKANSKA USA BUILDING, INC. vs. ATLANTIC YARDS B2 OWNER, LLC
The other case is:
FCRC MODULAR, LLC vs. SKANSKA MODULAR LLC